Original title: lack of virtue! Express the little brother Elevator 2 times ignition and depression, ignite the notice and then go away, 196 households panic.
Not long ago, a 33 year old courier was taken to court for the two time in a lift in a private house in Shanghai.
Monitoring pictures showed that around 2:40 pm on the day of the incident, the courier paid a number of large express bags to enter the building No. 11.
Fu went to express the chewing gum and entered the elevator. After closing the elevator door, Fu Mou took out a lighter from his pocket and lit the notice posted in the elevator.
Later, he pulled up the courier and watched the notice burn up before leaving the elevator.
After the first ignition, the smog in the elevator is diffused.
But this is far from over.
• second ignition:
After a while, Fu went into the elevator again. From the things dragged on his hand, he seems to have just delivered some of the express.
After entering the elevator, Fu Mou, without thinking, pulled out a lighter again and lit another notice posted in the elevator.
From the monitoring screen, we can see that the fire is burning fiercely.
What is worse is that after confirming that he has successfully ignited, Fu Mou dragged his express away.
That is to say, he allowed the notice to burn in the elevator.
After investigation, Fu Mou's behavior led to the destruction of the circuit board inside the elevator, and the value of the damage was 3700 yuan.
Pay an account, he sent the courier to the community for 5 or 6 years. He said he had no intention of igniting himself in the elevator. He just felt funny and killed the time.
In court, pay a statement is very relaxed and arbitrary, as if in the elevator ignition is not a big deal.
"When I wait for the elevator to go up, I'm free. I didn't expect to have such a big effect! "
The defendant paid a defence lawyer to argue that the case building had 33 layers and paid a certain ignition because it was too slow to be fined by the company. It should be convicted and sentencing in accordance with the crime of provocation.
The defendant pays a defence lawyer:
"From the defendant's confession of facts, it can be concluded that it is not intentional ignition, letting the elevator burn down, but rather making trouble out of nothing."
According to the prosecutor, there are 196 households in the building of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the elevator, and the act of paying a certain amount has already jeopardizing public safety, causing great security risks to the residents of the building.
"The act of paying one is in full conformity with the constitutive requirements of the crime of fire, and shall be investigated for criminal responsibility by a crime of fire and sentenced to imprisonment for more than 3 years and less than 4 years."
The case did not appear in court.
Think about it.
If the fire is not controlled, it will ignite other facilities of the building.
* if the fire in the elevator caused the explosion and other dangerous accidents;
If someone with unknowingly presses the elevator button, they are ready to take the elevator.
If the household is trapped and can't go out...
The consequences are unimaginable!
Even the children know
The elevator can't make a noise, can't play with fire
The courier brother
In the end he is supposed to be a "giant baby"
Or lack of basic upbringing?
What do you think?
Editor in responsibility: Yu Pengfei
Waonews is a news media from China, with hundreds of translations, rolling updates China News, hoping to get the likes of foreign netizens